Skip to content
Pillar IV · Research Report Generator

The write-up, drafted at the end of the analysis.

Every analysis run in Aixys carries enough metadata to generate the document around it: what data was used, what tests were chosen, what the results were, what the limitations are. The report generator stitches those into a polished PDF or Word document in your house style — ready for a stakeholder, sponsor, or peer reviewer.

Analysis → draft
< 60s
Export formats
PDF · DOCX
House style preserved
Branded
Research brief · auto-drafted
cover · methods · results · 6 pages
Aixys · Research BriefQ2 2026 · v1.0

Cultivar × Nitrogen Response — Spring Wheat 2026

Three-cultivar by four-fertilizer split-plot trial across four blocks (n=48). Yield (t/ha) compared with two-way ANOVA + Tukey HSD post-hoc.

01 · Methodology

Sites · 2 locations · CRD within block. Plots 18 m². Cultivars C1/C2/C3 randomised within each of 4 blocks. Nitrogen rates 0/60/120/180 kg N/ha applied at GS-30.

02 · Statistical test

Two-way ANOVA (cultivar × N) with block as random effect. Assumptions: residuals approximately normal (Shapiro p=0.31); variance homogeneous (Levene p=0.18). Two outliers flagged (|z| > 2.5) and retained per pre-analysis plan.

03 · Sample

n = 48 plot-level observations. Power = 0.89 to detect Δ = 0.35 t/ha (σ = 0.42, α = 0.05). All blocks completed.

04 · Findings
N0N1N2N3

Fig 1. Mean yield (t/ha) by cultivar × N rate. F(2,33) = 38.21, p < 0.001 for cultivar main effect.

Cultivar C2 yielded significantly higher than C1 and C3 across all nitrogen rates (Tukey HSD, p < 0.05). N3 (180 kg N/ha) did not differ significantly from N2 (120 kg N/ha) for C2 (p = 0.142) — suggesting a yield plateau above 120 kg N/ha.

05 · Implications · draft

For C2 fields, consider 120 kg N/ha as the operating rate; additional N appears to deliver diminishing return at this site. Follow-up trial recommended to test the C2 × N plateau under drought stress.

aixys.ai · research brief · 2026-04-29page 1 / 6
01 · capability

What you can do

Click any card to expand. Every action carries provenance — what data was used, what was decided, when, by whom.

01.5 · structure

Every report ships with the same five sections

The structure is fixed so reviewers know where to look. The content is yours — generated from the actual analysis, refined by your team.

01 · Cover & abstract

Title, sponsor, date, principal investigator, and a 120-word abstract drafted from the study question and conclusions.

02 · Methodology

Sites, sample, design type, randomisation, statistical test, software version. Pulled directly from the run metadata.

03 · Findings

Embedded figures with statistical references in the caption (F, p, n). Tables formatted to journal style or to your house template.

04 · Limitations

Drafted as a checklist — outliers retained, missing data handling, scope of inference — for the team to review before publication.

05 · Recommendations

Observation-only language by default. The human researcher decides what to do; the report records what was observed.

06 · Appendix

Raw test outputs, residual plots, data dictionary, and a reproducibility manifest pointing back to the source dataset version.

02 · in practice

How it shows up in the field

Three representative scenarios drawn from real research workflows. Click any to expand the follow-up that the team typically runs next.

03 · sectors

Where this belongs

Industries where this module is most directly relevant. The underlying engine is general — sector templates accelerate the work.

AgricultureBiotechSponsored researchConsultingAcademic groupsInternal R&D
Continue · 04

See the report generator module against your own data.

A 30-minute working session with the Aixys studio. Bring a real dataset; leave with an analysis, a plan, and answers to your team's hardest research-ops questions.